Demonstration of myosin heavy chain isoforms in rat and humans: the specificity of seven available monoclonal antibodies used in immunohistochemical and immunoblotting methods
AbstractThe aim of this paper was to present our experience with seven monoclonal antibodies, six of them were applied in immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting of MyHC isoforms in rats and humans, one of them, 6H1 (Lucas et al., 2000), was tested in human muscle sections only. The four antibodies specific to rat MyHC isoforms, BA-D5, SC-71, BF- 35, BF-F3 (Schiaffino et al., 1989) reacted as declared both on muscle sections and immunoblots of rat except SC-71 antibody, which stained MyHC-2a and -2x bands in blots. One of the two commercially available antibodies, A4.74 antibody, reliably marked type 2a fibres of rat, but in blots it weakly stained MyHC-2a and -2x isoforms when used undiluted. The other one, F113.15F4, stained type 2a and 2x fibres and corresponding MyHC bands in blots. Therefore, using this antibody rat MyHC-2x can be additionally confirmed, which can be otherwise demonstrated only on the principle of exclusion with BF-35. Using the same set of antibodies human fast MyHC isoforms can be revealed less clearly. Namely, SC-71 and A4.74 antibodies intensively stained histochemical type 2a, predominantly expressing 2a MyHC transcripts and moderately type 2x fibres, expressing mostly 2x MyHC transcripts, in blots the antibodies recognized both fast isoforms. The 6H1antibody was the only one that selectively labelled type 2x fibres, whereas BF-35 left unstained only a variable proportion of histochemical type 2x fibres and MyHC-2x in blots. F113.15F4 did not distinguish between human fast fibre types and corresponding MyHC isoforms in blots. The negative results obtained with BF-F3 in muscle sections and in blots are in agreement with the absence of MyHC-2b in human skeletal muscles. Our results imply that the reactivity of antibodies specific to distinct MyHC isoforms should be carefully evaluated not only among various species but with the two different techniques used as well.
PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.
Copyright (c) 2009 V Smerdu, T Soukup
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.