Comparison of different histological protocols for the preservation and quantification of the intestinal mucus layer in pigs

  • Ilen Röhe | ilen.roehe@fu-berlin.de Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Germany.
  • Friedrich Joseph Hüttner Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Germany.
  • Johanna Plendl Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Germany.
  • Barbara Drewes Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Germany.
  • Jürgen Zentek Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Germany.

Abstract

The histological characterization of the intestinal mucus layer is important for many scientific experiments investigating the interaction between intestinal microbiota, mucosal immune response and intestinal mucus production. The aim of this study was to examine and compare different fixation protocols for displaying and quantifying the intestinal mucus layer in piglets and to test which histomorphological parameters may correlate with the determined mucus layer thickness. Jejunal and colonal tissue samples of weaned piglets (n=10) were either frozen in liquid nitrogen or chemically fixed using methacarn solution. The frozen tissue samples were cryosectioned and subsequently postfixed using three different postfixatives: paraformaldehyde vapor, neutrally buffered formalin solution and ethanol solution. After dehydration, methacarn fixed tissues were embedded in paraffin wax. Both sections of cryopreserved and methacarn fixed tissue samples were stained with Alcian blue (AB)-PAS followed by the microscopically determination of the mucus layer thickness. Different pH values of the Alcian Blue staining solution and two mucus layer thickness measuring methods were compared. In addition, various histomorphological parameters of methacarn fixed tissue samples were evaluated including the number of goblet cells and the mucin staining area. Cryopreservation in combination with chemical postfixation led to mucus preservation in the colon of piglets allowing mucus thickness measurements. Mucus could be only partly preserved in cryosections of the jejunum impeding any quantitative description of the mucus layer thickness. The application of different postfixations, varying pH values of the AB solution and different mucus layer measuring methods led to comparable results regarding the mucus layer thickness. Methacarn fixation proved to be unsuitable for mucus depiction as only mucus patches were found in the jejunum or a detachment of the mucus layer from the epithelium was observed in the colon. Correlation analyses revealed that the proportion of the mucin staining area per crypt area (relative mucin staining) measured in methacarn fixed tissue samples corresponded to the colonal mucus layer thickness determined in cryopreserved tissue samples. In conclusion, the results showed that cryopreservation using liquid nitrogen followed by chemical postfixation and AB-PAS staining led to a reliable mucus preservation allowing a mucus thickness determination in the colon of pigs. Moreover, the detected relative mucin staining area may serve as a suitable histomorphological parameter for the assessment of the intestinal mucus layer thickness. The findings obtained in this study can be used for the implementation of an improved standard for the histological description of the mucus layer in the colon of pigs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2018-02-05
Section
Original Papers
Keywords:
Mucus layer, mucin, intestine, pig, fixation, goblet cell, histochemistry.
Statistics
Abstract views: 666

PDF: 171
HTML: 184
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Röhe, I., Hüttner, F. J., Plendl, J., Drewes, B., & Zentek, J. (2018). Comparison of different histological protocols for the preservation and quantification of the intestinal mucus layer in pigs. European Journal of Histochemistry, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2018.2874